U.S. Flag Official website of the Department of Homeland Security

Note: This page is part of the us-cert.gov archive.This document is part of the US-CERT website archive. These documents are no longer updated and may contain outdated information. Links may also no longer function. Please contact info@us-cert.gov if you have any questions about the US-CERT website archive.

TLP:WHITE

Alert (TA04-147A)

CVS Heap Overflow Vulnerability

Original release date: May 26, 2004

Systems Affected

  • Concurrent Versions System (CVS) versions prior to 1.11.16
  • CVS Features versions prior to 1.12.8

Overview

A heap overflow vulnerability in the Concurrent Versions System (CVS) could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable system.

Description

CVS is a source code maintenance system that is widely used by open-source software development projects. There is a heap memory overflow vulnerability in the way CVS handles the insertion of modified and unchanged flags within entry lines. When processing an entry line, an additional byte of memory is allocated to flag the entry as modified or unchanged. There is a failure to check if a byte has been previously allocated for the flag, which creates an off-by-one buffer overflow. By calling a vulnerable function several times and inserting specific characters into the entry lines, a remote attacker could overwrite multiple blocks of memory. In some environments, the CVS server process is started by the Internet services daemon (inetd) and may run with root privileges.

An authenticated client could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code, execute commands, modify sensitive information, or cause a denial of service. Note that if a CVS server is configured to permit anonymous read-only access, then this provides sufficient access to exploit a vulnerable server, as anonymous users are authenticated through the cvspserver process.

US-CERT is tracking this issue as VU#192038. This reference number corresponds to CVE candidate CAN-2004-0396.

Impact

An authenticated client could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable system with the privileges of the CVS server process. It is possible for an anonymous user with read-only access to exploit a vulnerable server as they are authenticated through the cvspserver process.

In addition to compromising the system running CVS, there is a significant secondary impact in that source code maintained in CVS repositories could be modified to include Trojan horses, backdoors, or other malicious code.

Solution

Apply Patch or Upgrade

Apply the appropriate patch or upgrade as specified by your vendor. For vendor specific responses, please see your vendor's website or Vulnerability Note VU#192038.

This issue has been resolved in Stable CVS Version 1.11.16 and CVS Feature Version 1.12.8.

Disable CVS Server

Until a patch or upgrade can be applied, consider disabling the CVS server.
Block or Restrict Access
Block or restrict access to the CVS server from untrusted hosts and networks. The CVS server typically listens on 2401/tcp, but may use another port or protocol.

Limit CVS Server Privileges
  • Configure CVS server to run in a restricted (chroot) environment.
  • Run CVS servers with the minimum set of privileges required on the host file system.
  • Provide separate systems for development (write) and public/anonymous (read-only) CVS access.
  • Host public/anonymous CVS servers on single-purpose, secured systems.
Note that some of these workarounds will only limit the scope and impact of possible attacks. Note also that anonymous (read-only) access is sufficent to exploit this vulnerability.

Appendix B. References



US-CERT thanks Stefan Esser of e-matters for reporting this problem and for information used to construct this advisory.


Feedback can be directed to the authors: Jason A. Rafail and Damon Morda


Revision History

  • May 26, 2004: Initial release

    Last updated

This product is provided subject to this Notification and this Privacy & Use policy.

Was this document helpful?  Yes  |  Somewhat  |  No

Back to Top